<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 3.0, Our Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://upthemes.com/2010/06/wordpress-3-0-our-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://upthemes.com/2010/06/wordpress-3-0-our-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Premium WordPress Themes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:11:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Wordpress 3.0 now available!</title>
		<link>http://upthemes.com/2010/06/wordpress-3-0-our-thoughts/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Wordpress 3.0 now available!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 03:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upthemes.com/?p=501#comment-132</guid>
		<description>[...] WordPress 3.0 Released [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WordPress 3.0 Released [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Wallace</title>
		<link>http://upthemes.com/2010/06/wordpress-3-0-our-thoughts/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upthemes.com/?p=501#comment-131</guid>
		<description>I agree. With 3.0, anything is truly possible. I still think as a CMS, WordPress isn&#039;t perfect. Drupal absolutely blows it away with it&#039;s ability to build full-blown web applications without touching a single line of code, but WordPress has a huge advantage from the user experience perspective. Drupal 6 and previous versions are pretty terrible in that regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. With 3.0, anything is truly possible. I still think as a CMS, WordPress isn&#8217;t perfect. Drupal absolutely blows it away with it&#8217;s ability to build full-blown web applications without touching a single line of code, but WordPress has a huge advantage from the user experience perspective. Drupal 6 and previous versions are pretty terrible in that regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://upthemes.com/2010/06/wordpress-3-0-our-thoughts/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 22:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upthemes.com/?p=501#comment-130</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s pretty exciting that it&#039;s now possible to create an ecommerce website with default WordPress functionality.
Matt Mullenweg did mention that the wp ecommerce plugin would only use WP tables instead of external table as in previous versions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s pretty exciting that it&#8217;s now possible to create an ecommerce website with default WordPress functionality.<br />
Matt Mullenweg did mention that the wp ecommerce plugin would only use WP tables instead of external table as in previous versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Wallace</title>
		<link>http://upthemes.com/2010/06/wordpress-3-0-our-thoughts/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upthemes.com/?p=501#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Evan, you are correct, Custom Taxonomies have actually been around since 2.3 with an improved system in 2.8 but 3.0 brings a new API for developers to work with them more easily. I have updated the post to be more exact with my language regarding taxonomies in 3.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan, you are correct, Custom Taxonomies have actually been around since 2.3 with an improved system in 2.8 but 3.0 brings a new API for developers to work with them more easily. I have updated the post to be more exact with my language regarding taxonomies in 3.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Mullins</title>
		<link>http://upthemes.com/2010/06/wordpress-3-0-our-thoughts/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Mullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.upthemes.com/?p=501#comment-128</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m stoked about the new release! But haven&#039;t custom taxonomies been around for a while? 2.8 I&#039;m thinking, and the capabilities/API since 2.4 or so? Don&#039;t get me wrong I like them, but I&#039;ve been using them for a while now...
Very excited about the menu and custom types though! FTW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m stoked about the new release! But haven&#8217;t custom taxonomies been around for a while? 2.8 I&#8217;m thinking, and the capabilities/API since 2.4 or so? Don&#8217;t get me wrong I like them, but I&#8217;ve been using them for a while now&#8230;<br />
Very excited about the menu and custom types though! FTW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 294/298 objects using disk: basic

Served from: upthemes.com @ 2012-02-04 04:13:51 -->
